Iso Nabhan v. the Estate of Eva Lujan Naban

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 6, 2003
• Docket: 08-02-00238-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

2) Caption, civil cases

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ISO NABHAN, Appellant, v. THE ESTATE OF EVA LUJAN NABHAN, Appellee.

§ §

No. 08-02-00238-CV Appeal from the Probate Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC# 2000-P00238)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Iso Nabhan, appellant, and Dolores Ortega, Lorraine Ybarra, and Fred Olivas, Jr., as executors of the Estate of Eva Lujan Nabhan, appellees, have filed a joint motion asking the Court to reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for entry of judgment in accordance with their agreement. We grant the parties' motion.

This Court has authority to dispose of the appeal on a joint motion by the parties pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), which states as follows:

(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

. . .

(2) By Agreement. In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:

(A) render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements;

(B) set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements; or

(C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2), and shall be granted the requested relief pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A).

The specific actions requested of this Court by the parties are granted to this Court under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 43.2, which allows in pertinent part, for the Court of Appeals to do the following:

(d) reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for further proceedings;

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d). The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion and concludes the motion should be granted. The action of this Court is in line with our decision in Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Services, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 323 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1995, no writ). We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court without

reaching the merits of this case and remand this cause to the trial court to effectuate the settlement of the parties.

SUSAN LARSEN, Justice

March 6, 2003

Before Panel No. 1

Larsen, McClure, and Chew, JJ.