Isley v. . Boone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Isley v. . Boone

20 S.E. 276, 115 N.C. 195

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 276 (Isley v. . Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isley v. . Boone, 20 S.E. 276, 115 N.C. 195 (N.C. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Parol evidence of the contents of the lost record was admissible (see this case reported in 109 N. C., 555), and upon due consideration we think that Mr. Parker’s testimony, under the peculiar circumstances, was properly received. We are also of the opinion that the defendant was not prejudiced by the introduction of the proceedings for dower. Upon the whole record, we see nothing that warrants a new trial. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Parol evidence of the contents of the lost record was admissible (see this case reported in 109 N. C., 555), and upon due consideration we think that Mr. Parker’s testimony, under the peculiar circumstances, was properly received. We are also of the opinion that the defendant was not prejudiced by the introduction of the proceedings for dower. Upon the whole record, we see nothing that warrants a new trial. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E. 276, 115 N.C. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isley-v-boone-nc-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack