Isley v. Arizona Department of Corrections
This text of 84 F. App'x 903 (Isley v. Arizona Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bradford K. Isley, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal as untimely of his habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that his petition was timely because his notice of post-conviction relief tolled the statute of limitations. A notice of post-conviction relief pursuant to Ariz. R.Crim. P. 32.4 is not a “properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review” under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2); it is only a preliminary step toward filing a petition that contains claims challenging a conviction or sentence. See Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 123 S.Ct. 1398, 1403, 155 L.Ed.2d 363 (2003) (federal habeas case not commenced upon filing of motions for appointment of counsel and for stay). Accordingly, Isley’s contention lacks merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isley-v-arizona-department-of-corrections-ca9-2003.