Isler v. Starke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isler v. Starke

17 A.D.2d 841, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7734

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 841 (Isler v. Starke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isler v. Starke, 17 A.D.2d 841, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellants for reargument of their prior motion for leave to prosecute on an abbreviated record their appeal from the judgment herein; for leave to prosecute on the original papers their appeal from the order settling the record, and for related relief, granted. Upon reargument, the decision of this court, dated September 24, 1962, is amended so as to provide: (a) that the prior motion is granted to the extent of dispensing with printing the record on both appeals; and (b) that the appeals shall be heard on the original papers and on the stenographer’s typewritten transcript of the complete minutes of the trial and hearing without deletions or additions, together with the appropriate statement under rule 234 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The briefs, however, shall be printed; appellant’s brief shall contain a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellants for reargument of their prior motion for leave to prosecute on an abbreviated record their appeal from the judgment herein; for leave to prosecute on the original papers their appeal from the order settling the record, and for related relief, granted. Upon reargument, the decision of this court, dated September 24, 1962, is amended so as to provide: (a) that the prior motion is granted to the extent of dispensing with printing the record on both appeals; and (b) that the appeals shall be heard on the original papers and on the stenographer’s typewritten transcript of the complete minutes of the trial and hearing without deletions or additions, together with the appropriate statement under rule 234 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The briefs, however, shall be printed; appellant’s brief shall contain a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 841, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isler-v-starke-nyappdiv-1962.