Isle of Paradise "A", Inc. v. Hotchkiss

453 So. 2d 205, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 1984
DocketNo. 84-780
StatusPublished

This text of 453 So. 2d 205 (Isle of Paradise "A", Inc. v. Hotchkiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isle of Paradise "A", Inc. v. Hotchkiss, 453 So. 2d 205, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant certiorari to the extent that we quash the order of the trial court compelling petitioner to answer interrogatory # 27. Respondent has failed to demonstrate that the information sought by this interrogatory is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the trial of this cause. See, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1). We find no error in the trial court’s order compelling petitioner’s answer to interrogatory # 6.

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

LETTS, BARKETT and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 205, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isle-of-paradise-a-inc-v-hotchkiss-fladistctapp-1984.