Isle of Palms Pest Control Company v. Monticello Insurance Company
This text of 468 S.E.2d 304 (Isle of Palms Pest Control Company v. Monticello Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case. Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co., 319 S.C. 12, 459 S.E. (2d) 318 (Ct. App. 1994). We grant the writ on petitioner’s Question I because it involves a novel question, deny the writ as to the remaining questions, dispense with further briefing, and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
In Question I, petitioner challenges the Court of Appeal’s holding that petitioner had a duty to defend and indemnify respondent in a third-party action because respondent’s failure to discover active termite infestation constituted a negligent inspection, and, therefore, any resulting damage to the home was an occurrence within the scope of the comprehensive general liability policy issued by petitioner. We agree with the reasoning and holding of the Court of Appeals on this issue. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 S.E.2d 304, 321 S.C. 310, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isle-of-palms-pest-control-company-v-monticello-insurance-company-sc-1996.