Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992)

DecidedOctober 22, 1992

DocketCase Number NC920340

StatusUnpublished

This text of Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992) (Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992), (R.I. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

DECISION Plaintiff sues defendant for payment of an overdue promissory note. Defendant filed its answer and the case is now before the Court on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit.

Defendant offered nothing contra, as provided in R.C.P. 56(e). There is no genuine issue of fact here and plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Tangleridge Dev. Corp. v. Joslin,570 A.2d 1109 (R.I. 1990). That judgment will be limited to the question of liability only under R.C.P. 56(c), and the case is continued for proof of claim.

The clerk will forthwith enter judgment for plaintiff on the liability issue only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

DECISION Plaintiff sues defendant for payment of an overdue promissory note. Defendant filed its answer and the case is now before the Court on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit.

Defendant offered nothing contra, as provided in R.C.P. 56(e). There is no genuine issue of fact here and plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Tangleridge Dev. Corp. v. Joslin,570 A.2d 1109 (R.I. 1990). That judgment will be limited to the question of liability only under R.C.P. 56(c), and the case is continued for proof of claim.

The clerk will forthwith enter judgment for plaintiff on the liability issue only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Island Trust Company v. Puerini's Italian Specialties, Nc920340 (1992), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/island-trust-company-v-puerinis-italian-specialties-nc920340-1992-risuperct-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack