Island Savings Bank v. Galvin
Opinion
The plea sets up by way of equitable defence that the plaintiff permitted the partnership property, on which it held a mortgage as security for the note in suit, to be sacrificed at the mortgagee’s sale, through the action of its treasurer, Edward Newton, to the end that said Newton might purchase the property for greatly less than its fair market value, which was more than enough to pay the amount due on the note. The demurrer admits these allegations.
We think that the defence is good, in that it sets up an equitable estoppel founded on the conduct of the plaintiff, wheíeby a deficiency has arisen which the plaintiff was the means'of creating. Innes v. Stewart, 36 Mich. 285; Re Collins, 17 Hun. 289 ; Equitable Life Ins. Society v. Stevens, 63 N. Y. 341.
Demurrer overruled, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
37 A. 809 (Island Savings Bank v. Galvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.