Island Improvements, Inc. v. May

231 A.D. 837
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for peremptory mandamus order directing the trial justice to render a decision and sign a judgment granted. The right to a jury trial having been waived, the action was properly tried by the court. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 426, 428.) The court, having tried the case, must decide it and make a decision and judgment, and the court’s action in setting aside the so-called decision and directing that the issues be tried before the court with a jury was not a proper exercise of discretion. (Smith v. Geiger, 202 N. Y. 306, 312; O’Brien v. Bowes, 4 Bosw. 657.) The form of relief is by the way of mandamus. (Norwegian Lutheran Trinity Church v. Krelsovitch, 147 App. Div. 108.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Island Improvements, Inc. v. May, 231 A.D. 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

231 A.D. 837 (Island Improvements, Inc. v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parkview Holding Corp. v. Joy
58 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Parkview Holding Corp. v. Starr
47 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
United States ex rel. Murphy v. Denno
234 F. Supp. 692 (S.D. New York, 1964)