Island Development Asset Management v. Greenwich Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Island Development Asset Management v. Greenwich Insurance

108 A.D.3d 509, 967 N.Y.S.2d 841

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 2013·Published

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the defendant New York Adjustment Bureau, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated May 8, 2012, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[510]*510In opposition to the prima facie showing of the defendant New York Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (hereinafter NYAB), of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether it is entitled to recover damages against NYAB on its causes of action sounding in breach of contract and negligence (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88-89 [1994]; Complete Mgt., Inc. v Rubenstein, 74 AD3d 722, 723 [2010]).

NYAB’s remaining contention is without merit.

Accordingly, NYAB’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it was properly denied. Rivera, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the defendant New York Adjustment Bureau, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated May 8, 2012, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[510]*510In opposition to the prima facie showing of the defendant New York Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (hereinafter NYAB), of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether it is entitled to recover damages against NYAB on its causes of action sounding in breach of contract and negligence (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88-89 [1994]; Complete Mgt., Inc. v Rubenstein, 74 AD3d 722, 723 [2010]).

NYAB’s remaining contention is without merit.

Accordingly, NYAB’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it was properly denied. Rivera, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Island Development Asset Management v. Greenwich Insurance, 108 A.D.3d 509, 967 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

108 A.D.3d 509 (Island Development Asset Management v. Greenwich Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related