Island Associated Coop., Inc. v. Hartmann

118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 830 (Island Associated Coop., Inc. v. Hartmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Island Associated Coop., Inc. v. Hartmann, 118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated June 25, 1984, which granted the defendant Fram Corporation’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it.

Order affirmed, with costs.

An employee of the defendant Fram Corporation (hereinafter Fram), the defendant Edward Hartmann, was caught removing inventory from the warehouse of the plaintiff, one of Fram’s customers. The plaintiff’s first cause of action against Fram is based on the doctrine of respondeat superior. Special Term correctly concluded that Hartmann did not act within the scope of his employment. Hartmann’s actions were in no way "incidental to the furtherance of the employer's interest” (Makoske v Lombardy, 47 AD2d 284, 288, affd 39 NY2d 773). While torts committed by an employee who inartfully tries to carry out his employer’s assignment may be found to be within the scope of employment (see, Riviello v Waldron, 47 [831]*831NY2d 297; Sims v Bergamo, 3 NY2d 531, 534-535; De Wald v Seidenberg, 297 NY 335, 337-338), torts committed for personal motives unrelated to the furtherance of the employer’s business cannot (see, e.g., Cornell v State of New York, 46 NY2d 1032; see, Restatement [Second] of Agency § 288 [1] comment [c], [2]), especially if the tortious acts are serious in nature (see, Restatement [Second] of Agency § 231 comment a).

The plaintiff presented no evidence to support its second cause of action that the defendant Fram had any knowledge of Hartmann’s actions, or its third cause of action that Fram in any way acted negligently in the selection or supervision of its employees. Mere speculation or surmise is not enough (Oates v Marino, 106 AD2d 289, 291-292; Mayer v McBrunigan Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 774). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anagnostakis v. Bonelli
2024 NY Slip Op 33267(U) (New York Supreme Court, Orange County, 2024)
Capak v. Epps
S.D. New York, 2020
Schecter v. Merchants Home Delivery, Inc.
892 A.2d 415 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
Kivlehan v. 2220 Adams Place Realty Corp.
2003 NY Slip Op 23968 (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2003)
Kivlehan v. 2220 Adams Place Realty Corp.
2 Misc. 3d 851 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Demas v. Levitsky
291 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
N. X. v. Cabrini Medical Center
280 A.D.2d 34 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Flores v. Saulpaugh
115 F. Supp. 2d 319 (N.D. New York, 2000)
P. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
102 F. Supp. 2d 132 (E.D. New York, 2000)
Ross v. Mitsui Fudosan, Inc.
2 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Bayard v. Riccitelli
952 F. Supp. 977 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Jonas v. Faith Properties, Inc.
221 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Seymour v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
215 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Adams v. New York City Transit Authority
211 A.D.2d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Gottlieb v. Sullivan & Cromwell
203 A.D.2d 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Polak v. City of Schenectady
181 A.D.2d 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Hall v. Danforth
172 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Savarese v. City of New York Housing Authority
172 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/island-associated-coop-inc-v-hartmann-nyappdiv-1986.