Isla v. State
185 So. 3d 695, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1972, 2016 WL 542833
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 2016
DocketNo. 5D15-1191
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 185 So. 3d 695 (Isla v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Isla v. State, 185 So. 3d 695, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1972, 2016 WL 542833 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel- to adopt'the pro se motion, the effective- date of an adopted pro se motion is the date it is adopted- and not the initial date the unauthorized pleading was filed.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cornelius v. State
223 So. 3d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Clifton Cornelius v. State
223 So. 3d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
185 So. 3d 695, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1972, 2016 WL 542833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isla-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.