Isirdo Vargas, Jr. v. State
This text of Isirdo Vargas, Jr. v. State (Isirdo Vargas, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00083-CR
Isirdo Vargas, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR2015-114, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s appointed counsel, Atanacio Campos, has filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel. In his motion, counsel asserts that good cause exists for his withdrawal because the
appellant has filed a motion in the trial court requesting that he be allowed to proceed pro se in
this appeal.
The legislature has given the trial court the responsibility of appointing counsel in
criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). When counsel is appointed
by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to
relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999,
no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 WL 363677. At *1 (Tex. App.—Austin
Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We therefore abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing
on this motion to withdraw, appoint new counsel, if appropriate, and make appropriate findings and
recommendations. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3); see Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780, 784
(Tex. Crim. App. 1976) (right to self representation extends to appellate process). A supplemental
record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court
reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the clerk of this Court as a supplemental record not later than
thirty days from the date of this opinion.
It is so ordered this 30th day of June 2016.
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
Abated and Remanded
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Isirdo Vargas, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isirdo-vargas-jr-v-state-texapp-2016.