Isiramen v. Yuma Regional Medical Center

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided March 17, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-02749·Unknown

Opinion

3 4 Omon Bridget Isiramen, No. CV-18-02749-PHX-JAS 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 Vv. Yuma Regional Medical Center, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) issued by 11 Magistrate Judge Lynnette Kimmins. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Kimmins recommends enter an order granting Defendant’s motion for summary 13 judgement (Doc. 38). As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motion, the objections are denied.! 15 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 16 (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is accepted and 17 adopted. (2) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's complaint } (Doc. 1) 1s dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case 20 file. 1 Dated this 16th day of March, 2020. 22 23 \ _ — ¢ 24 Honorable James A. Soto 25 United States District Judge 26 ' The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 27 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(by. The Court reviews for clear error the Corp! TOF. 30134, 139 (Ith Cie 1999); see also Conley v. Crabiree, 14 F.Supp. 24 1903, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isiramen v. Yuma Regional Medical Center, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Isiramen v. Yuma Regional Medical Center (Isiramen v. Yuma Regional Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Zager
14 F. Supp. 23 (D. Maryland, 1936)