Isidro Ramos III v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 7, 2021·No. 04-20-00564-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 7, 2021

No. 04-20-00564-CR

Isidro RAMOS III, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR9685 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER The State has filed a motion to supplement the clerk’s record, stating that certain pleadings were missing from the record. However, the items referred to by the State are included in the clerk’s record. Therefore, the State’s motion to supplement the clerk’s record is DENIED.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isidro Ramos III v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Isidro Ramos III v. the State of Texas (Isidro Ramos III v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.