Isgett v. Isgett

101 S.E. 788, 126 Va. 599, 1920 Va. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided January 22, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Kelly, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This‘is a suit for divorce by Bertie Isgett against her husband, J. W. Isgett, on the ground of desertion. The circuit court denied the relief prayed for upon the authority of Walker v. Walker, 120 Va. 410, 91 S. E. 180. We are of opinion, however, that the evidence sufficiently established the desertion, and that, therefore, the case is not controlled by the decision of this court in Walker v. Walker, but belongs to the class of cases of which Lamb v. Lamb, ante, p. 256. 101 S. E. 223, and Grim v. Grim, ante, p. 245, 101 S. E. 140, are illustrations. The decree complained of will, therefore, be reversed, vand a decree entered here in accordance with the prayer of the bill.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isgett v. Isgett, 101 S.E. 788, 126 Va. 599, 1920 Va. LEXIS 10 (Va. 1920).

101 S.E. 788 (Isgett v. Isgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byerly v. Byerly
140 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1927)
Dinsmore v. Dinsmore
104 S.E. 785 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1920)