Isett v. Frees
77 P.2d 873, 25 Cal. App. 2d 466, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843
Opinion
Upon submission of the motion to dismiss, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:
This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. (In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isett v. Frees, 77 P.2d 873, 25 Cal. App. 2d 466, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).
77 P.2d 873 (Isett v. Frees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Upper Third Street Development Corp. v. City of Milwaukee
99 N.W.2d 687 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1959)
Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the Missouri
304 S.W.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1957)
Levin v. Levin
148 P.2d 714 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Green v. Ellis
108 P.2d 732 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)