Home/California Court of Appeal/Isett v. Frees

Isett v. Frees

77 P.2d 873, 25 Cal. App. 2d 466, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 23, 1938
DocketCiv. No. 11778
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 P.2d 873 (Isett v. Frees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isett v. Frees, 77 P.2d 873, 25 Cal. App. 2d 466, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Upon submission of the motion to dismiss, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. (In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Upper Third Street Development Corp. v. City of Milwaukee
99 N.W.2d 687 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1959)
Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the Missouri
304 S.W.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1957)
Levin v. Levin
148 P.2d 714 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Green v. Ellis
108 P.2d 732 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 P.2d 873, 25 Cal. App. 2d 466, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isett-v-frees-calctapp-1938.