Isert v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

Kentucky Supreme Court

Isert v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

834 S.W.2d 651, 1992 Ky. LEXIS 48, 1992 WL 71103

CourtKentucky Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 1992

DocketNo. 90-SC-41-KB

StatusPublished

This text of 834 S.W.2d 651 (Isert v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isert v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 834 S.W.2d 651, 1992 Ky. LEXIS 48, 1992 WL 71103 (Ky. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

Movant, John H. Isert, III, resigned from the practice of law for a period of five years in 1984. He has filed an application in this Court for reinstatement to the practice of law in this Commonwealth pursuant to SCR 3.520, and has complied with all of the requirements of the rules pertaining to reinstatement. The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association has recommended to this Court that Mr. Isert’s application for reinstatement be denied. We have reviewed the record and the recommendation of the Board, and, subject to the [652]*652terms and conditions offered by the movant in his appeal from the recommendation of the Board of Governors, we have decided to grant the Motion for Reinstatement.

It is therefore ordered that the movant, John H. Isert, III, be and is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this Commonwealth subject to the payment of costs and on the following conditions:

1) The Hon. John T. Rankin, Attorney, 717 W. Market Street, Suite 4, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, has agreed to carefully monitor the movant’s progress at remaining sober and to submit periodic reports (quarterly) to the Kentucky Bar Associa-. tion. The reinstatement is granted subject to the filing of such reports for the next three years.

2) The movant has agreed to be subject to summary discipline whereby if any alcoholic beverages are consumed by him in the future, his license would be revoked without further formal proceedings of any kind.

STEPHENS, C.J., and COMBS, LAMBERT, LEIBSON, REYNOLDS and WINTERSHEIMER, JJ., concur.

ENTERED: April 9, 1992.

(S) Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

Movant, John H. Isert, III, resigned from the practice of law for a period of five years in 1984. He has filed an application in this Court for reinstatement to the practice of law in this Commonwealth pursuant to SCR 3.520, and has complied with all of the requirements of the rules pertaining to reinstatement. The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association has recommended to this Court that Mr. Isert’s application for reinstatement be denied. We have reviewed the record and the recommendation of the Board, and, subject to the [652]*652terms and conditions offered by the movant in his appeal from the recommendation of the Board of Governors, we have decided to grant the Motion for Reinstatement.

It is therefore ordered that the movant, John H. Isert, III, be and is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this Commonwealth subject to the payment of costs and on the following conditions:

1) The Hon. John T. Rankin, Attorney, 717 W. Market Street, Suite 4, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, has agreed to carefully monitor the movant’s progress at remaining sober and to submit periodic reports (quarterly) to the Kentucky Bar Associa-. tion. The reinstatement is granted subject to the filing of such reports for the next three years.

2) The movant has agreed to be subject to summary discipline whereby if any alcoholic beverages are consumed by him in the future, his license would be revoked without further formal proceedings of any kind.

STEPHENS, C.J., and COMBS, LAMBERT, LEIBSON, REYNOLDS and WINTERSHEIMER, JJ., concur.

ENTERED: April 9, 1992.

(S) Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

834 S.W.2d 651, 1992 Ky. LEXIS 48, 1992 WL 71103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isert-v-kentucky-bar-assn-ky-1992.