Isenhower v. State Industrial Accident Commission
This text of 424 P.2d 216 (Isenhower v. State Industrial Accident Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment allowing plaintiff increased compensation for the aggravation of a back injury suffered while at work.
Defendant contends that there is no evidence to [160]*160prove aggravation. Further defendant contends that even if it is assumed that there was such evidence, the aggravation could have been the result of a previous back condition and there was no evidence to show that the aggravation resulted from the industrial injury rather than from the previous condition.
We are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 P.2d 216, 246 Or. 159, 1967 Ore. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isenhower-v-state-industrial-accident-commission-or-1967.