Isear v. Hoadley

37 N.Y.S. 1104, 74 N.Y. St. Rep. 286
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 12, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 37 N.Y.S. 1104 (Isear v. Hoadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isear v. Hoadley, 37 N.Y.S. 1104, 74 N.Y. St. Rep. 286 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

TRUAX, J.

The demurrer is overruled, with costs, with leave to defendants to answer on payment of costs. See decision of Mr. Justice Beekman in Isear v. McMahon (Sup.) 37 N. Y. Supp. 1101.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isear v. McMahon
16 Misc. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 N.Y.S. 1104, 74 N.Y. St. Rep. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isear-v-hoadley-nysupct-1896.