Isbell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Isbell v. State

568 S.W.3d 89

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106433

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 89 (Isbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isbell v. State, 568 S.W.3d 89 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Terry Isbell, Sr. ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2016) motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Terry Isbell, Sr. ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2016) motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isbell-v-state-moctapp-2019.