Isaza v. State
This text of 746 So. 2d 492 (Isaza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clemente ISAZA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*493 Clemente Isaza, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order denying defendant's motion for post-conviction relief solely on the ground that defendant's plea was involuntary based on misadvice of counsel regarding the amount of time defendant would serve on the sentence imposed. See Rensoli v. State, 718 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). As the record does not conclusively refute defendant's claim, this cause is remanded for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
746 So. 2d 492, 1999 WL 1015713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaza-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.