Isaias Gonzalez-Maya v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 444 F. App'x 211 (Isaias Gonzalez-Maya v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Isaías Gonzalez-Maya, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Salta v. INS, 314 F.3d 1076, 1078 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on the ground that Gonzalez-Maya failed to demonstrate that personal service of the Order to Show Cause provided him insufficient notice of his hearing. See Khan v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 825, 829 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaias-gonzalez-maya-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.