Isaiah Maurice Hill v. State

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2015.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00581-CR

ISAIAH MAURICE HILL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-34630-X

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Isaiah Maurice Hill was convicted, following the adjudication of his guilt, of aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the motion to

adjudicate guilt and was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment pursuant to a plea bargain

agreement. He waived his right to appeal as part of the agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18

S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified that appellant has no right

to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App.

2013); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 1

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

150581F.U05

1 Due to our disposition of the appeal, we take no action on appellant’s June 29, 2015 pro se “motion to overturn conviction.”

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ISAIAH MAURICE HILL, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00581-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F11-34630-X. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2015.

–3–