Isaiah L. Powell v. Maryland House of Correction, Attorney General of the State of Maryland

943 F.2d 49, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25473, 1991 WL 181135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1991
Docket91-6577
StatusUnpublished

This text of 943 F.2d 49 (Isaiah L. Powell v. Maryland House of Correction, Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isaiah L. Powell v. Maryland House of Correction, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 943 F.2d 49, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25473, 1991 WL 181135 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

943 F.2d 49

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Isaiah L. POWELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION, Attorney General of the State
of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-6577.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 25, 1991.
Decided Sept. 17, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-2136-HAR)

Isaiah L. Powell, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Cathleen C. Brockmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Isaiah L. Powell seeks to appeal from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Powell v. Warden, Maryland House of Corrections, CA-90-2136-HAR (D.Md. May 8, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 F.2d 49, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25473, 1991 WL 181135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaiah-l-powell-v-maryland-house-of-correction-attorney-general-of-the-ca4-1991.