Isadore Perry v. U.S. Parole Commission, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

918 F.2d 174, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25785, 1990 WL 178191
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 1990
Docket90-6646
StatusUnpublished

This text of 918 F.2d 174 (Isadore Perry v. U.S. Parole Commission, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isadore Perry v. U.S. Parole Commission, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 918 F.2d 174, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25785, 1990 WL 178191 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

918 F.2d 174
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Isadore PERRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Attorney General of the State of
North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6646.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James B. McMillan, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-285-C-C-M)

Isadore Perry, appellant pro se.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Isadore Perry appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. United States Parole Comm'n, CA-90-285-C-C-M (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bryant (Preston)
918 F.2d 174 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 F.2d 174, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25785, 1990 WL 178191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isadore-perry-v-us-parole-commission-attorney-gene-ca4-1990.