Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc.

221 F.2d 868
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1955
Docket12385
StatusPublished

This text of 221 F.2d 868 (Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc., 221 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of fact upon which the trial court concluded that the payment to appellee Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc. “constituted a preference but not a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act [11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.].” Since we think the evidence is sufficient, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1
11 U.S.C. § 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 F.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isadore-brill-trustee-in-bankruptcy-for-phillips-television-and-cadc-1955.