Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc.

D.C. Circuit

Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc.

221 F.2d 868

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 6, 1955·No. 12385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of fact upon which the trial court concluded that the payment to appellee Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc. “constituted a preference but not a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act [11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.].” Since we think the evidence is sufficient, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of fact upon which the trial court concluded that the payment to appellee Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc. “constituted a preference but not a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act [11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.].” Since we think the evidence is sufficient, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc., 221 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Pincite

221 F.2d 868 (Isadore Brill, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Phillip's Television and Appliances, Inc. v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc., Washington Times-Herald, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related