Isacowitz v. Halpern Construction, Inc.

73 A.D.3d 565, 899 N.Y.S.2d 847

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: May 18, 2010
• Status: Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Cpurt, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered January 29, 2009, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its claims for payment against defendants Halpern Construction, Inc. and General Accident Insurance Company of America and dismissing said defendants’ counterclaims and affirmative defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment is precluded by triable issues of fact including whether plaintiff breached its contracts with the construction manager by failing to pay its material suppliers; whether plaintiff failed to perform its contracts in accordance with their time-of-the-essence provisions; whether the construction manager properly terminated plaintiff for untimely performance; and whether the construction manager’s noncompliance with the agreements’ three-day notice to cure requirement was excusable on the ground of plaintiffs alleged abandonment of the project. Concur—Tom, J.P., McGuire, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 30180(U).]