Isabelle Edwards v. Boxer Property Management
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed February 28, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01481-CV
ISABELLE EDWARDS, Appellant V.
BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-08079
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Whitehill, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Myers
We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, it appeared the
appealed order, the order on motion to authorize disposal of property, was not
appealable. Appellant had the opportunity to address our concerns, but failed to file
a letter brief by her January 21, 2020 deadline to do so.
Subject to mostly statutory exceptions, an appeal may be taken only from a
final judgment that disposes of all parties and claims. See Lehmann v. Har-Con
Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The record here reflects appellant’s breach
of contract/lease claim remains pending.
Because nothing before us demonstrates we have jurisdiction, we dismiss the
appeal and all pending motions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
191481F.P05
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ISABELLE EDWARDS, Appellant On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01481-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-08079.
Opinion delivered by Justice Myers.
BOXER PROPERTY Justices Whitehill and Pedersen, III MANAGEMENT, Appellee participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 28th day of February, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isabelle Edwards v. Boxer Property Management (Isabelle Edwards v. Boxer Property Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.