Isabelle Collins v. The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge & Jerry Ewing Chariman of the Deacon Board
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
ISABELLE COLLINS NO. 2026 CW 0629 VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2
THE GREATER TRUE LOVE
BAPTIST CHURCH OF BATON
ROUGE & JERRY EWING CHAIRMAN AUGUST 28, 2026 OF THE DEACON BOARD
In Re: The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge and Jerry Ewing, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 753954.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, C.J., WOLFE, HESTER, MILLER AND STROMBERG, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The trial court's April 24, 2026 judgment denying the peremptory exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by defendants, The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge and Jerry Ewing, is reversed, in part, as to plaintiff’s claims that defendants denied her access to the pastor's study and improperly unveiled the pastor's chair, thereby causing her emotional distress.
The protections afforded by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Louisiana Constitution prohibit civil courts from resolving disputes that require interpretation of religious doctrine or interference with matters of internal church governance. Fairfield Pentecostal Church v. Johnson, 2015-68 (La. App. 3d Cir. 6/3/15), 170 So.3d 357, writ denied, 2015-1531 (La. 10/23/15), 179 So.3d 607. Accordingly, civil courts are prohibited from adjudicating ecclesiastical matters, including those concerning religious discipline, rule, custom, or law. LeBlanc v. Davis, 432 So.2d 239, 241 (La. 1983). This prohibition, however, is not absolute. Where a dispute may be resolved through the application of neutral principles of law without interpreting or evaluating religious doctrine or practice, Civil courts retain subject matter Jurisdiction. Id.
Resolution of plaintiff's claims, alleging that she was denied access to the pastor's study and that defendants improperly unveiled the pastor's chair causing plaintiff emotional distress, require judicial inguiry into matters of internal church governance, administration, and custom, rather than the application of neutral principles of law. See Glass v. First United Pentecostal Church of DeRidder, 95-1442 (La. App. 3d Cir. 6/12/96), 676 So.2d 724. Therefore, we find that the trial court has no subject matter jurisdiction over these claims. Accordingly, the exception of lack of subject matter Jurisdiction filed by defendants, The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge and Jerry Ewing, is granted, in part, as to these claims, which are dismissed without prejudice.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 2026 CW 0629
PAGE 2 OF 2
Plaintiff's claim that defendants made defamatory statements about her, thereby causing emotional distress, however, may be resolved through the application of neutral principles of law without requiring interpretation of religious doctrine or church governance. Accordingly, the writ is denied as to this claim.
PMc EW
CHH
TPS
Miller, J., dissents and would deny the writ, finding that the exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction should not be granted in part.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CLERK OF C FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isabelle Collins v. The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge & Jerry Ewing Chariman of the Deacon Board (Isabelle Collins v. The Greater True Love Baptist Church of Baton Rouge & Jerry Ewing Chariman of the Deacon Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.