Isabel M. v. Benigno P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isabel M. v. Benigno P.

18 A.D.3d 555, 794 N.Y.S.2d 673

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 555 (Isabel M. v. Benigno P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isabel M. v. Benigno P., 18 A.D.3d 555, 794 N.Y.S.2d 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the putative father appeals, by permission, from an order of filiation of the Family Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated May 18, 2004, which adjudicated him to be the father of the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515 [1998]; cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the putative father appeals, by permission, from an order of filiation of the Family Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated May 18, 2004, which adjudicated him to be the father of the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515 [1998]; cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 555, 794 N.Y.S.2d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isabel-m-v-benigno-p-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack