Isabel del Pino-Allen v. Sarah E. Egan
This text of Isabel del Pino-Allen v. Sarah E. Egan (Isabel del Pino-Allen v. Sarah E. Egan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 3, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1963 Lower Tribunal No. 23-19498 ________________
Isabel del Pino-Allen, Appellant,
vs.
Sarah E. Egan, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.
Isabel del Pino-Allen, in proper person.
Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Gursky Ragan, P.A. v. Ass'n of Poinciana Vills., Inc., 314 So.
3d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Dadic v. Schneider, 722 So. 2d 921, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“[Counsel] made the statements during the course of judicial
proceedings to inform the court of the reasons for the motion. Thus, his
statements were absolutely privileged [from a defamation claim].”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Isabel del Pino-Allen v. Sarah E. Egan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isabel-del-pino-allen-v-sarah-e-egan-fladistctapp-2024.