Isaacson v. Samson Window Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isaacson v. Samson Window Corp.

84 A.D.2d 643, 444 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.2d 643 (Isaacson v. Samson Window Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaacson v. Samson Window Corp., 84 A.D.2d 643, 444 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 26, 1980, which affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge’s decision that the death of claimant’s decedent arose out of and in the course of his employment. The board found: “based on the record, particularly the testimony of Mr. Jackalone, that the attack upon decedent as he attempted to report to work was an incident of the employment. There is no evidence of wilful intent on decedent’s part. The death arose out of and in the course of employment.” Substantial evidence supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 26, 1980, which affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge’s decision that the death of claimant’s decedent arose out of and in the course of his employment. The board found: “based on the record, particularly the testimony of Mr. Jackalone, that the attack upon decedent as he attempted to report to work was an incident of the employment. There is no evidence of wilful intent on decedent’s part. The death arose out of and in the course of employment.” Substantial evidence supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.2d 643, 444 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacson-v-samson-window-corp-nyappdiv-1981.