Isaacs v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

221 A.2d 83, 243 Md. 687, 1966 Md. LEXIS 575
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 5, 1966·No. App. No. 121·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The petitioner, Robert Isaacs, fails to state in his application for leave to appeal to this Court any reasons why the lower court’s order should he reversed or modified, as required by Maryland Rule BK46 b, and his application may be denied for that reason alone. Jones v. Warden, 241 Md. 728, 217 A. 2d 338; Taylor v. Warden, 238 Md. 645, 210 A. 2d 514. However, because the petitioner was convicted of the crime of murder, we have reviewed the contentions he put to the trial judge. We find no merit in any of them and for the reasons stated by Judge Byrnes in his opinion the application will be denied.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isaacs v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 221 A.2d 83, 243 Md. 687, 1966 Md. LEXIS 575 (Md. 1966).

221 A.2d 83 (Isaacs v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boone v. State
466 A.2d 66 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Cabiness v. Warden
236 A.2d 43 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1967)
Brewster v. Warden
221 A.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)