Isaacs v. Prospect Park, LLC
This text of 95 A.D.3d 1176 (Isaacs v. Prospect Park, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated September 21, 2010, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 7503 (a) to compel arbitration.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant is not entitled to arbitration, as the parties did [1177]*1177not agree that the arbitration clause in the contract at issue was to survive the delivery of title (see 527 Smith St. Brooklyn Corp. v Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp., 262 AD2d 278 [1999]; cf. Matter of Praetorian Realty Corp. [Presidential Towers Residence], 40 NY2d 897 [1976]).
In light of our conclusion, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Mastro, A.P.J., Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A.D.3d 1176, 943 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacs-v-prospect-park-llc-nyappdiv-2012.