Isaacs v. Isaacs
This text of 297 A.D.2d 608 (Isaacs v. Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The interim $25,000 fee award was a proper exercise of discretion under Domestic Relations Law § 238 (see Silberman v Silberman, 216 AD2d 41, appeal dismissed 86 NY2d 835). Any right defendant had to a hearing on plaintiff’s cross mo[609]*609tion was waived by his failure to object to its determination on the papers submitted, or to otherwise request a hearing (see Beal v Beal, 196 AD2d 471, 473). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 608, 747 N.Y.2d 361, 747 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacs-v-isaacs-nyappdiv-2002.