Isaacs v. Isaacs

297 A.D.2d 608, 747 N.Y.2d 361, 747 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8841
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 26, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 608 (Isaacs v. Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isaacs v. Isaacs, 297 A.D.2d 608, 747 N.Y.2d 361, 747 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The interim $25,000 fee award was a proper exercise of discretion under Domestic Relations Law § 238 (see Silberman v Silberman, 216 AD2d 41, appeal dismissed 86 NY2d 835). Any right defendant had to a hearing on plaintiff’s cross mo[609]*609tion was waived by his failure to object to its determination on the papers submitted, or to otherwise request a hearing (see Beal v Beal, 196 AD2d 471, 473). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Abrams v. Abrams
2024 NY Slip Op 02363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Lewittes v. Lewittes
2 A.D.3d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 608, 747 N.Y.2d 361, 747 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacs-v-isaacs-nyappdiv-2002.