Isaacs v. Isaacs
154 A. 340, 34 Del. 406, 4 W.W. Harr. 406, 1930 Del. LEXIS 28
Opinion
delivering the opinion of the court:
The words omitted from the appeal bond would not affect the rights of the appellee under such bond if judgment should be rendered against the appellant; and we, therefore, think that the bond in question sufficiently complies with the statute.
This conclusion is not inconsistent with the cases cited by the plaintiff below, and his motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore, refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isaacs v. Isaacs, 154 A. 340, 34 Del. 406, 4 W.W. Harr. 406, 1930 Del. LEXIS 28 (Del. Ct. App. 1930).
154 A. 340 (Isaacs v. Isaacs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Maykowski
41 A.2d 464 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)