Isaacs v. Camplin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Isaacs v. Camplin

17 S.C.L. 411

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 15, 1830

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 S.C.L. 411 (Isaacs v. Camplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaacs v. Camplin, 17 S.C.L. 411 (N.C. Ct. App. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case there is no room for doubt, inasmuch as the act of 1733, has expressly provided, that in order to prevent vexatious suits against justices of the peace, bailiffs, constables, sergeants in the militia, and other officers, for any act done by them in pursuance and by virtue of the duties of their office, they may plead the general issue, not guilty, and give the special matter of their defence in evidence. P. L. 133. This motion must, therefore, be refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case there is no room for doubt, inasmuch as the act of 1733, has expressly provided, that in order to prevent vexatious suits against justices of the peace, bailiffs, constables, sergeants in the militia, and other officers, for any act done by them in pursuance and by virtue of the duties of their office, they may plead the general issue, not guilty, and give the special matter of their defence in evidence. P. L. 133. This motion must, therefore, be refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.C.L. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacs-v-camplin-ncctapp-1830.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack