Isaacs v. 455 West 34

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isaacs v. 455 West 34

278 A.D.2d 82, 717 N.Y.S.2d 531, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13102

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 82 (Isaacs v. 455 West 34) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaacs v. 455 West 34, 278 A.D.2d 82, 717 N.Y.S.2d 531, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about August 11, 1999, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a prior order granting a preliminary injunction on default, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 12, 1999, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendant’s cross motion to vacate the default upon which the court premised its grant of judgment to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s motions for vacatur were properly denied since defendant failed to show that it possessed a meritorious defense. Defendant never offered the affidavit of a knowledge[83]*83able fact witness to substantiate its bare and evidently merit-less claim that plaintiff tenant had violated the terms of his lease (see, Adefioye v Volunteers of Am., 222 AD2d 246, 247). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about August 11, 1999, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a prior order granting a preliminary injunction on default, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 12, 1999, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendant’s cross motion to vacate the default upon which the court premised its grant of judgment to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s motions for vacatur were properly denied since defendant failed to show that it possessed a meritorious defense. Defendant never offered the affidavit of a knowledge[83]*83able fact witness to substantiate its bare and evidently merit-less claim that plaintiff tenant had violated the terms of his lease (see, Adefioye v Volunteers of Am., 222 AD2d 246, 247). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 82, 717 N.Y.S.2d 531, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaacs-v-455-west-34-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack