Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00040-CR
Isaac ZARATE, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-CR-7743 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 11, 2026
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Appellant Isaac Zarate was convicted of aggravated robbery pursuant to a plea bargain
agreement. The trial court imposed sentence on December 4, 2015. Because Zarate did not file a
motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due by January 4, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.
26.2(a)(1). However, Zarate did not file a notice of appeal until December 29, 2025, over ten years
after sentence was imposed. We note that Zarate filed his notice of appeal as a pro se litigant and
has since been appointed appellate counsel. 04-26-00040-CR
On January 27, 2026, we ordered Zarate’s newly appointed appellate counsel to show cause
why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Counsel has responded and
concedes that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider appellant’s appeal.
Because a timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction
and the record before us clearly reflects that Zarate’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we do
not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas (Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.