Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
DecidedFebruary 11, 2026
Docket04-26-00040-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas (Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00040-CR

Isaac ZARATE, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-CR-7743 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 11, 2026

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant Isaac Zarate was convicted of aggravated robbery pursuant to a plea bargain

agreement. The trial court imposed sentence on December 4, 2015. Because Zarate did not file a

motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due by January 4, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). However, Zarate did not file a notice of appeal until December 29, 2025, over ten years

after sentence was imposed. We note that Zarate filed his notice of appeal as a pro se litigant and

has since been appointed appellate counsel. 04-26-00040-CR

On January 27, 2026, we ordered Zarate’s newly appointed appellate counsel to show cause

why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Counsel has responded and

concedes that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider appellant’s appeal.

Because a timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction

and the record before us clearly reflects that Zarate’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we do

not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2014); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Taylor, Henry Earl
424 S.W.3d 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Isaac Zarate v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-zarate-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.