Isaac v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Isaac v. State

360 S.W.3d 348, 2012 WL 698435, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 277

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2012

DocketED 96593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 360 S.W.3d 348 (Isaac v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaac v. State, 360 S.W.3d 348, 2012 WL 698435, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 277 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

*349 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold Isaac (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to make timely Batson challenges to the State’s peremptory strikes.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI