Isaac v. State
This text of 826 So. 2d 396 (Isaac v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lemuel E. ISAAC, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anne C. Toolan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1) is AFFIRMED. The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466. 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply when the sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum permitted by section 775.082, Florida Statutes. See Lee v. State, 808 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); McCloud v. State, 803 So.2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Gilson v. State 795 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
826 So. 2d 396, 2002 WL 1610235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.