Isaac v. State

826 So. 2d 396, 2002 WL 1610235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2002·No. 1D01-3527·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

826 So.2d 396 (2002)

Lemuel E. ISAAC, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D01-3527.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 23, 2002.
Rehearing Denied September 20, 2002.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anne C. Toolan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1) is AFFIRMED. The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466. 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply when the sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum permitted by section 775.082, Florida Statutes. See Lee v. State, 808 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); McCloud v. State, 803 So.2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Gilson v. State 795 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isaac v. State, 826 So. 2d 396, 2002 WL 1610235 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

826 So. 2d 396 (Isaac v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fleming
61 So. 3d 399 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Thompson v. State
949 So. 2d 1169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Galindez v. State
955 So. 2d 517 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Isaac v. State
911 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Hughes v. State
826 So. 2d 1070 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)