Isaac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Isaac v. State

543 So. 2d 1293, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2952, 1989 WL 55290

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1215

StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 1293 (Isaac v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaac v. State, 543 So. 2d 1293, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2952, 1989 WL 55290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Jerry Lee Isaac was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and trafficking in cocaine based upon one drug transaction, and was also convicted of both delivery and possession of cocaine based upon another drug transaction. The delivery and possession counts involved a single undivided quantity of cocaine based upon the second drug transaction. A defendant may not be convicted of delivery and possession of cocaine predicated on a single underlying act. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987); Fuentes v. State, 533 So.2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d [1294]*1294910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine must be set aside on the grounds that it constitutes multiple punishment for the same act. We, therefore, reverse appellant’s conviction for possession and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate that conviction and recalculate the sentence for the remaining convictions.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Jerry Lee Isaac was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and trafficking in cocaine based upon one drug transaction, and was also convicted of both delivery and possession of cocaine based upon another drug transaction. The delivery and possession counts involved a single undivided quantity of cocaine based upon the second drug transaction. A defendant may not be convicted of delivery and possession of cocaine predicated on a single underlying act. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987); Fuentes v. State, 533 So.2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d [1294]*1294910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine must be set aside on the grounds that it constitutes multiple punishment for the same act. We, therefore, reverse appellant’s conviction for possession and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate that conviction and recalculate the sentence for the remaining convictions.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 So. 2d 1293, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2952, 1989 WL 55290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack