Isaac v. Hiatt
177 F.2d 146, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3146
Opinion
A careful consideration of the judgment in this case in the light of the record leaves us in no doubt that the appeal is without merit. Zerbst v. McPike, 5 Cir., 97 F.2d 253; Rohr v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d [147]*147747; Lunsford v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 653. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isaac v. Hiatt, 177 F.2d 146, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3146 (5th Cir. 1949).
177 F.2d 146 (Isaac v. Hiatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lunsford v. Hudspeth
126 F.2d 653 (Tenth Circuit, 1942)
Rohr v. Hudspeth
105 F.2d 747 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)
Zerbst v. McPike
97 F.2d 253 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)