Isaac v. Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isaac v. Clay

202 A.D.2d 1047, 610 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3436

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because both parties have extensive custodial rights under the stipulated joint custody order and because petitioner’s income greatly exceeds the income of respondent, we find no error in Family Court’s denial of petitioner’s request for child support. If in the future the disparity between incomes lessens, a new petition may be filed. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Kohout, J. — Child Support.) Present — Balio, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because both parties have extensive custodial rights under the stipulated joint custody order and because petitioner’s income greatly exceeds the income of respondent, we find no error in Family Court’s denial of petitioner’s request for child support. If in the future the disparity between incomes lessens, a new petition may be filed. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Kohout, J. — Child Support.) Present — Balio, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Isaac v. Clay, 202 A.D.2d 1047, 610 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 1047 (Isaac v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related