Isaac L. Anderson Jr. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2018·No. 5D17-4083·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ISAAC L. ANDERSON, JR., Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-4083 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Robert J. Egan, Judge.

David J. R. Frakt, of Law Office of David Frakt, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion to “correct sentence.” Appellant has admittedly completed serving what he contends is an invalid sentence, thus rendering the issue before us moot. See Sneed v. State, 749 So. 2d 545, 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing Palmer v. State, 182 So. 2d 625, 626 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isaac L. Anderson Jr. v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Isaac L. Anderson Jr. v. State (Isaac L. Anderson Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sneed v. State
749 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Palmer v. State
182 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)