Isaac Joel Hernandez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
Docket01-07-00930-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Isaac Joel Hernandez v. State (Isaac Joel Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isaac Joel Hernandez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion







In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NOS. 01-07-00930-CR

01-07-00931-CR



ISAAC JOEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1108363 and 1108362



MEMORANDUM OPINION

We lack jurisdiction to hear these appeals. The trial court sentenced appellant, Isaac Joel Hernandez, and signed a final judgment in cause numbers 110863 and 1108362 on September 18, 2007. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial; therefore, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was October 18, 2007, 30 days after sentencing. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

Appellant filed a notice of appeal in each case on October 22, 2007, four days after the deadline. The notices were deposited in the mail on October 19, 2007 as per the postmark on the copy of the envelope included in the clerk's record. Because the notices were mailed after the filing deadline, they did not comply with the "mailbox rule." See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Although the notices were filed within the 15-day time period for filing a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, no such motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.

An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest the appellate court with jurisdiction to hear the case. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Douglas v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 605-06 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals in cause number 1108363 and in cause number 1198362 for lack of jurisdiction.

We dismiss as moot any pending motions.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Keyes.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas v. State
987 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Isaac Joel Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-joel-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2007.