Isaac Elio Flores v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 16, 2014·No. 11-13-00373-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion filed January 16, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

No. 11-13-00373-CR

ISAAC ELIO FLORES, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 132nd District Court Scurry County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 9929

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Isaac Elio Flores has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying Flores’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. We dismiss the appeal.

The clerk of this court wrote Flores on December 11, 2013, and informed him that the order from which he was attempting to appeal did not appear to be an appealable order. We requested that Flores respond on or before December 30,

2013, and show grounds to continue the appeal. Flores has filed a brief, but he has not shown grounds upon which this appeal may continue.

An intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). Consequently, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

January 16, 2014 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isaac Elio Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Isaac Elio Flores v. State (Isaac Elio Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanchez v. State
112 S.W.3d 311 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Everett v. State
82 S.W.3d 735 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)