Isaac C. v. Veronica R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Isaac C. v. Veronica R.

18 A.D.3d 327, 794 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5454

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 327 (Isaac C. v. Veronica R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaac C. v. Veronica R., 18 A.D.3d 327, 794 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Maricel Gonzalez-Roman, Ref.), entered on or about December 18, 2002, which denied the petition seeking modification of the custody of the parties’ son, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of petitioner’s failure to demonstrate any changed circumstances since the 1996 order granting custody to respondent, or any evidence that respondent was an unfit mother or that continued custody with her was not in the best interests of the child, the application for modification was properly denied (Steck v Steck, 307 AD2d 819 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Maricel Gonzalez-Roman, Ref.), entered on or about December 18, 2002, which denied the petition seeking modification of the custody of the parties’ son, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of petitioner’s failure to demonstrate any changed circumstances since the 1996 order granting custody to respondent, or any evidence that respondent was an unfit mother or that continued custody with her was not in the best interests of the child, the application for modification was properly denied (Steck v Steck, 307 AD2d 819 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 327, 794 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-c-v-veronica-r-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack