Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 454
United States Customs Court·Decided April 10, 1957·No. No. 60610; protests 268572-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[455]*455Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” and “B” consist of dime savings banks similar in all material respects to those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 12 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of tin or tin plate, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 22){ percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, for manufactures of metal, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 454 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 454 (Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M. Pressner & Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 262 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)